The court upheld the selections of The 2 reduced courts, which experienced rightly disbelieved the statements with the plaintiff’s witnesses regarding the evidence with the alleged oral reward. The absence of substantial proof to assist the claim of the oral reward led for the dismissal from the petitioner’s situation. The https://best-property-lawyer-in-k61842.arwebo.com/54056840/top-latest-five-leasehold-and-tenancy-advocate-in-karachi-urban-news